Sunday, October 2, 2011

Who I am as a Communicator

I was not surprised to find that the way I view myself and the way others view me differ. That is normally how human nature works. I have always had a fear of public speaking but have had to speak in public quite often throughout my career. I scored myself at a 48 on the communication survey while my husband scored me at 38 and my coworker scored me at 31. My husband knows I do not like to speak in public yet he also has seen me do it for my job and be successful at it. My coworkers have seen me speak and do not know that I have that fear. Therefore my coworker scored me as if I didn’t have this great fear.
My listening styles did not surprise me at all. All of the career and personality tests I have taken throughout my life have indicated that I am a people person. I have always been sensitive and my feeling hurt for others when they are in pain or need. I always mother people and love to help people with their problems. We all grouped me into Group 1 during this survey indicating the same people oriented personality. I love being around people and talking and learning about them.
I do not like confrontation yet I will stand up for what I believe in and let my opinion be known. I scored a 64 on the verbal aggressive survey yet my coworker scored me at a 56. This is because I listen to everyone’s point and do not belittle anyone because we all have different opinion. On the other hand my husband scored me higher with an 81. This is because we have a very different relationship and obviously will argue our points more aggressively than professionally.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Established Contact with My German Childhood Professional

My contact actually changed from Tonya Schmidt to Thomas Volz. He studied in New York and Turkey. He taught school in Turkey and in Boveria at the Abuture, which they call the place of higher learning durin ghte first years. He also taught Turkish students to speak English for 4 years. He has 3 boys of his own that are 11, 12 and 15 years old. Whe I asked him to tell me about povery in Germany that he might have experienced and how it affects children, this is what he wrote to me:
"In Germany the federal social security system is (still) so comprehensive that you hardly notice any differences between rich and poor students in class. As (still) most of our schools end at 1pm, lunch, nutrition and healthcare is predominantly considered a private matter. People are very touchy about the government interfering in these questions. So it is left to health care providers to inform and teach the public on a voluntary basis. Of Course schools support this, but not as an integral part of the basic curriculum. The stress is on academic subjects".
"However, times are changing. More and more schools exand their lessons into the afternoon and the schools provide lunch. This is generally a cheap alternative to private lunch served at home. Here the schools monitor ingediences and nutrition very closely because many parents are very aware of this topic"
"The gap between rich and poor is, however, quite obvious on a higher academic level. Children that are academically supported at home are more likely to proceed to higher education and achieve better results on the long run. This more a question of how educated the parents/families are. But as education and income are unextricably entwined the link between academic achievement and income is a sad (German) fact"